Close Menu
  • Home
  • Crypto News
    • Bitcoin
    • NFT News
  • Metaverse
  • Defi
  • Blockchain
  • Regulations
  • Trading

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Amendment Stablecoin Bill To Face 2nd Vote

May 17, 2025

Panama City Mayor Teases Bitcoin Reserve Plan After Meeting El Salvador Officials

May 17, 2025

Bitcoin Poised For $120,000 Rally As Wyckoff Accumulation Hits Final Phase, Analyst Says

May 17, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
CredBit.com
  • Home
  • Crypto News
    • Bitcoin
    • NFT News
  • Metaverse
  • Defi
  • Blockchain
  • Regulations
  • Trading
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
CredBit.com
Home » Allegations of running pump and dump schemes surface against former head of OpenSea Ventures
NFT News

Allegations of running pump and dump schemes surface against former head of OpenSea Ventures

October 8, 20235 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit VKontakte
Allegations of running pump and dump schemes surface against former head of OpenSea Ventures
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email
Allegations of running pump and dump schemes surface against former head of OpenSea Ventures

Grave allegations of involvement in pump and dump schemes are gathering steam against the former head of OpenSea Ventures, Kevin Pawlak.

According to NFT Ethics, a non-fungible token (NFT) related investigative news account on X, Pawlak has masterminded or been involved in “various very dubious business dealings” as well as pump and dump schemes. NFT Ethics claims that Pawlak allegedly perpetrated the fraudulent activities through his pseudonymous identity “@0xSisyphus“ and “0xMagellan.”

The evidence against Pawlak unearthed last month

NFT Ethics first made the allegations against Pawlak last month. At the time, it concluded after an investigation that Pawlak was the owner of the X account @0xSisyphus. The X-based news channel concluded after comparing the transactions and corresponding time stamps of pawlak.eth and sisyphus.eth addresses. 

Blockchain data indicates that an Ethereum address starting with “0xBB5B” registered domains like kevinpawlak.eth, pavvlak.eth, pawlak.eth, and kevinpawlak.eth on October 4, 2021.

The NFT Ethics investigation revealed that both addresses—pawlak.eth and sisyphus.eth—minted Zorbs tokens within a minute of each other, and sismo.eth DAO tokens within 10 minutes of each other.

With screenshots comparing the activities of the two addresses in question, NFT Ethics wrote:

“…the following timestamps perfectly match up, and given the very limited activity of pawlak.eth, we have now accounted for most of their actions that are perfectly in line with sisyphus.eth.”

NFT Ethics later added that several anonymous sources have confirmed that Pawlak is indeed the individual behind the account Sisyphus. The news channel also claimed that Pawlak had a “dubious role” in the $60 million AnubisDAO rugpull in October 2021 and had a hand in a “Rollbit shill.”

An alternative theory to Anubis Rugpull

In a post 10 days after the initial allegations, NFT Ethics posted a thread alleging that the Anubis incident was a “premeditated rug” by Sisyphus and that the stolen funds were being laundered through PEPE tokens.

According to NFT Ethics, Pawlak, under his pseudonym, allegedly “hyped” the Anubis project on Discord a day before the rugpull, which was recorded by a user.  Pawlak claimed to have invested $420,000 in the project and vowed to invest more the next day. At the time, the funds of the Anubis project rested in the hands of Ethan Cheung, a 19-year-old.

When the project was rugged the next day, Cheung claimed to have received an email from Sisyphus containing a malicious PDF file that compromised his device and wallet. According to NFT Ethics, Cheung’s version of the story has been corroborated by several individuals. Sisyphus, however, released a blog post allegedly “framing” Cheung for the rug pull.

NFT Ethics concluded that Sisyphus likely orchestrated the Anubis rug pull with a co-conspirator and added:

“The role of Pawlak, Zim & Co. in the $60m Anubis rug & other PnD schemes is deserving of far more scrutiny. They have the intellectual/technical ability to orchestrate such “hacks” and we hope for a deep investigation into the origins of all their crypto/FIAT funds/purchases.”

More evidence revealed

In a follow-up post on Oct. 5, NFT Ethics shared screenshots of chat logs from the Anubis team dated 27-29 October 2021. From the chats, NFT Ethics concluded that Sisyphus was the “brain” behind the Anubis project, who was in charge of approving everything from the wording of X posts to all technical and financial decisions.

NFT Ethics added:

“He conveniently falsified his role in his timeline as “Sisyphus to handle public face and helping pull DAO members together”, but he is the one in charge & calling the shots.”

NFT Ethics added further screenshots to allege that Sisyphus masterminded the Anubis rug pull and framed Cheung to take the fall.

In their latest post, which was reposted by blockchain analytics platform Lookonchain, NFT Ethics noted:

“We refrained from posting these earlier, but the amount of silence on this subject is deafening. Because he is well-connected, not many people dare to speak out about this fraudulent network of people.”

Lookonchain has also independently verified that the transaction time stamps on the two addresses, pawlak.eth and sisyphus.eth, sync together. The platform added:

“The #OpenSea executive is one of the largest PnD (Pump and Dump) in the field and is involved in market manipulation and scams. If this were true, that would be terrible.”

The allegations against Pawlak have been confirmed by a journalist at The Block, Tim Copeland, who said he confirmed Sisyphus’ identity via undisclosed sources.

It is worth noting that former OpenSea product manager Nate Chastain was convicted of fraud and money laundering in an insider trading case in May 2023. Chastain was sentenced to three months in prison in August.

CryptoSlate reached out to OpenSea for comment and a spokeperson from OpenSea provided the following statement:

“Kevin is a former employee who left the company in June of 2023. He had a limited scope while at OpenSea- where he worked in a non-management position. We have no awareness of his involvement with the projects in question. Furthermore, we have no connection to, or information about, the projects in question, as they took place before his time at OpenSea.”


Credit: Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit VKontakte Telegram WhatsApp

Related Posts

What Are AI dApps?: How Blockchain and AI Unite for Next-Level Innovation

February 7, 2025

NFT Gaming Market Forecast 2025–2030: Worldwide Trends

February 7, 2025

Somnia Blockchain Tops 1.05M TPS in Devnet, Sets Sights on Testnet Launch

February 6, 2025

NFT Collectibles Market 2025: Future Trends, Expert Predictions, and Investment Insights

February 6, 2025

Kuroro Wilds Alpha Launch: How to Score Big in the 30 Million $KURO Giveaway

February 5, 2025

The Transformation of Roulette Through Technology

February 4, 2025

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Amendment Stablecoin Bill To Face 2nd Vote

May 17, 2025

Panama City Mayor Teases Bitcoin Reserve Plan After Meeting El Salvador Officials

May 17, 2025

Bitcoin Poised For $120,000 Rally As Wyckoff Accumulation Hits Final Phase, Analyst Says

May 17, 2025

Explosive Dogecoin On-Chain Signals Show Breakout Potential

May 17, 2025
© 2025 - credbit.com - All Rights Reserved!
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • DMCA

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.